Singing Robot

Leica M9

Yamaha introduced its Disklavier piano way back in 1986. The Disklavier is a Yamaha piano with a built-in playback and recording system. When playing back the recording, the keys are pressed down, much like a player piano, so you hear essentially the same performance that was recorded on the same or similar piano. Because the performance is stored as a MIDI file, you could play a tune on a Disklavier in one city and have it play back—live or delayed—on another Disclavier in another city.

Recently, Yamaha has touted the benefit of this system for parents, by referring to the recordings as a lifelog. You could capture every performance of your child from the very first piano lesson to however far your child might progress on the instrument. MIDI files are tiny, so you could easily store a lifetime of practice sessions, lessons learned, and accomplished performances onto a single disk drive.

At this year’s CEATEC tradeshow, Yamaha added yet another twist to the technology. The company showed a prototype HRP-4C humanoid robot that sings in sync with a Disklavier piano performance. It not only sings—it has realistic facial expressions that mimic quite persuasively the human face. I spoke with Masahiro Koyama, Ph. D., who works for the Center of Advanced Sound Technologies in Tokyo. He said the facial expressions are based on what a face and mouth would look like when those particular sounds are produced.

There are no immediate plans to commercialize the singing robot, which uses Yamaha’s proprietary Vocaloid vocal-processing technology to create the lifelike singing voice (here’s a YouTube link to the performance at the booth). Cover bands across the world can rest easy, at least for the time being.

Posted in Other | Tagged , | Leave a comment

More Oh, Wow Photography

Leica M9

I’m a big fan of the Leica M8.2 digital camera. So for me, the big news for today isn’t the announcement of the new Apple iPods or the remastered Beatles CDs — though both of those developments are important. For me, the place to be was the Leica press conference held in New York this morning for the unveiling of the new Leica M9 digital camera.

Rumors have been flying for weeks now about the M9′s imminent arrival. It didn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that a 9:00 a.m. press conference on 09/09/09 might indicate something to do with a “9″ designated product.

With a list price of $6,995 for just the camera body, the M9 clearly isn’t for everyone. However, based on my experience with the previous models, Leica has taken an incredible camera and made it even better. As good as the M8 and M8.2 are, they have two significant limitations. They don’t have a full frame sensor, and you have place an IR filter on each lens to prevent a color aberration from appearing in certain circumstances. The M9 solves both issues.

The M9 has a full frame sensor, which means a 28mm lens will function as a true 28mm lens (because of the 1.33 crop factor, a 28mm lens on an M8 or M8.2 has a field of view that’s closer to a 37mm lens). Equally important, there’s a significant increase in resolution because of the larger sensor size.

For the M9, Leica has brought the IR filter into the camera, so owners won’t have to add an IR filter to each lens. The IR issue might seem to be a flaw, but it’s actually a result of Leica’s obsession with delivering the sharpest possible image (it’s a long story — search Google for details).

The bottom line? The M9 is currently the smallest full-frame digital camera system. And it accepts the finest lenses in the world, which just happen to be manufactured by Leica. As you may have guessed, they aren’t cheap either, though there is a healthy market for used Leica lens. Essentially, any M-mount Leica lens going back to 1954 will be compatible. And third-party companies, including Zeiss and Cosina, manufacture new M-mount lenses that can be nearly as good as the Leica lenses, but cost far less.

Along with the M9, Leica introduced the X1 digital camera ($1,995 list price). Like the Sigma DP1 and DP2, it combines a sharp non-interchangeable fixed lens, DSLR-size sensor, and compact-size body. The X1 will produce terrific photos, though you won’t be able to change the focal length, as you can with any zoom lens. The DP1, DP2, and X1 have automatic focus, so they’re a better match than the M9 for camera buffs who aren’t quite ready to go mostly manual.

The Leica M9 doesn’t have automatic focus, but has what many regard to be the finest manual focus system available. Once you become acquainted with the M-series’ bright-line viewfinder, you may not want to go back to an automatic system where the camera always determines where to place the focus.

I’m only an amateur camera buff with limited talent, but I’ve been able to capture some of my best photos with a Leica M8.2, including this, this, this, this, this, this, and this.

Posted in Digital Cameras | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Oh, Wow Photography

Sigma DP2

It’s all too easy to become caught up in the numbers. With digital cameras, we fixate on the highest ISO numbers, largest megapixel numbers, and widest zoom numbers. The problem is these specifications don’t exist in a vacuum.

As you increase the ISO and megapixels, you also boost the amount of noise in the image. And as you increase the range of the zoom, the sharpness can suffer, as well as the ability of the camera to perform well in low light. Camera manufacturers have developed impressive workarounds for the accompanying drawbacks, but my point is you can’t just go by the numbers and assume that better specs are the end-all and be-all when choosing a product.

Case is point is Sigma’s DP1 and DP2 cameras. On paper, they seem very limited. In fact, they are limited — because they aren’t trying to be versatile cameras that take good, though unexceptional pictures in a wide variety of settings. The DP1 and DP2 don’t have a zoom lens, and you shouldn’t expect stellar performance from them at higher ISO settings.

Their strengths? They have a large DSLR-size sensor in a small point-and-shoot-size body, an extremely sharp fixed lens (a 28mm equivalent with the DP1, and a 41mm equivalent with the DP2), and a Foveon sensor that gives your photos a different look from the Bayer sensor found in almost every other digital camera.

I could go on and on about the situations where the DP1 and DP2 wouldn’t be the best choice. In those situations, you would probably be better off with a camera that’s more versatile, because it makes various compromises to even out its strengths. All I know is that during the year I’ve owned a DP1 (and more recently, a DP2), I’ve used it to snap some of my best photos. Yet if I had gone purely by industry specifications, I might never have considered it.

Keeping in mind that the DP1 measures just 4.5 inches by 2.3 inches by 2.0 inches, if I had been carrying a similar-sized, more-versatile camera instead of a DP1, would I have been able to capture this, this, or this?

What sold me on the DP1 was the quality of the images I saw posted just after it became available. It was a potent reminder that specifications have to take a back seat to the actual results you receive from a product. The specifications are guidelines that too often give you an imperfect, narrow view of the product’s performance.

Sometimes you have to go with your gut instinct and support those manufacturers who are willing to buck the trend and create a product that isn’t focused simply on gaming the specs or appealing to as wide an audience as possible. With cameras, as well as many other products, it may make sense to choose a more specialized model, as long as you understand the limitations and trade-offs.

Posted in Digital Cameras | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Convert MP3 Ringtones to iPhone Ringtones

iPhone

You don’t have to look far to find free MP3 ringtones on the Internet. They’re pretty much everywhere — including here on Beepzoid.

The problem for iPhone owners is, how do you convert them for your iPhone? iTunes can convert them for you, though the process is a bit confusing unless you have step-by-step instructions.

Here are 10 steps you can use to convert a standard MP3 ringtone into an AAC-based ringtone that’s compatible with your iPhone.

1. In iTunes, choose “Add File to Library” from the “File” pull-down menu.

2. Browse to the file you want to convert. Select it and open it.

3. Click on the newly created icon for the file to select it. You should find the icon in the Albums view of the Music Library, most likely labeled as “Unknown Album, Unknown Artist.” Once selected, the icon will have a blue border.

4. Choose “Create AAC Version” from the “Advanced” pull-down menu.

5. You can now delete the two new icons that were created for the Albums view — you won’t need them anymore. To delete an icon, right click it and select “Delete” from the menu options.

6. Now you’ll need to find the converted file in order to rename it. On my PC, the file is saved along this folder path: My Documents/My Music/iTunes/iTunes Music/Unknown Artist/Unknown Album.

7. Change the extension of the converted file from .m4a to .m4r.

8. Back in iTunes, select the Ringtones Library. Then choose “Add File to Library” from the “File” pull-down menu.

9. Browse for the renamed .m4r file. Select it and open it.

10. Your converted MP3-format ringtone should now be available as an M4R-format ringtone for your iPhone.

That’s the method I used to convert MP3 ringtones to iPhone ringtones for Beepzoid’s Vintage Phone Ringtones page. I can’t guarantee this process will work for you, but it has yielded consistent results for me with minimal fuss.

Posted in Audio, Cellphones | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Say What?

BlueAnt Q1

Do you fumble with your Bluetooth headset because you can’t remember how many times you’re supposed to press the tiny buttons? Or do you find yourself repeatedly taking the headset off your ear because you can’t distinguish the buttons just by touch?

Unfortunately, those are common complaints with Bluetooth headsets. BlueAnt’s Q1 headset promises to remedy those issues by making the commands almost entirely voice controlled.

I was highly dubious about this approach before I tried the Q1. What would I do in an exceptionally noisy environment if the Q1 couldn’t understand me? Would I miss the call? And how would I remember all the different voice commands, especially if I used the headset only occasionally?

BlueAnt has addressed the problem of exceptionally noisy environments — as well as situations where it may be awkward to speak out loud — by providing dual methods for dealing with incoming calls. Using the voice commands, you can say “answer” to accept the call or “ignore” to reject the call. Alternatively, you can press the Q1′s big button once to accept the call or twice to reject it. Both methods worked fine for me.

Remembering the commands hasn’t been an issue either. Hold that same button down until you hear the Q1 say, “Say a command.” Then if you ask “What can I say,” you’ll hear the available voice commands, which include tasks such as “call back,” redial,” “check battery,” and “settings menu.” “Teach me” initiates an audio tutorial. “Pair me” pairs the headset with your phone (it can handle two phones simultaneously and remember as many as eight different devices). “Call speed dial 3″ automatically dials one of your eight stored speed dial numbers.

The only times I ran into problems with the Q1 understanding me was when I was in an exceptionally noisy environment or when I didn’t have the headset positioned properly toward my mouth. You need to have the two microphones lined up for it to understand your voice commands or for the built-in noise suppression to function effectively. The detachable ear hook is handy for when you’re physically active, though I found the two different-sized ear tips did a pretty good job of holding the headset in place.

Most importantly, the audio clarity has been consistently top-notch for both ends of the conversation. If you don’t mind the price (it lists for $129), the Q1 is well worth considering.

Posted in Cellphones, Wireless | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Instant Wi-Fi

D-Link Pocket Router

If you travel a lot, you’ve probably encountered a hotel, convention center, or remote office that supplies an Ethernet jack rather than Wi-Fi. That’s generally not a problem. Most notebook computers can handle both types of Internet connections.

Sometimes, however, I prefer to connect over Wi-Fi. I might want to use my notebook away from the desk in the hotel room. Or I might want an Internet connection for my iPod Touch or BlackBerry Curve — both are Wi-Fi enabled.

Being able to connect a Wi-Fi enabled phone can be especially handy if you’re traveling outside the country, and your phone isn’t compatible with local cellular standards. With a Wi-Fi phone, you may be able to make and receive calls over Wi-Fi using your regular phone number and be charged as though you’re making a local phone call.

So how do you convert an Ethernet jack into a Wi-Fi access point? You can use D-Link’s DWL-G730AP Wireless Pocket Router. It sells for about $50, comes with a durable carrying case, and supports three wireless modes: Router, Access Point, and Wireless Client.

Set up can be a little tricky, as the documentation isn’t as clear as it should be, though once you have it configured with your Wi-Fi-enabled devices, you can just plug it in and connect. (For tips on configuring the DWL-G730AP, check the comments section for the product on Amazon.com. Here’s a link to the review there that helped me configure it as an access point. Unfortunately, I can’t offer advice beyond that.)

The DWL-G730AP can handle multiple connected devices at the same time, so you could provide Internet access for family, friends, or co-workers. WPA security is built-in, and you can hide the SSID as an additional safeguard. You could configure the SSID and password for your own devices before the trip, and then supply that information to others while traveling.

Posted in Cellphones, Laptops, Wireless | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Next Billion Cameras

Photos

One of the most interesting sessions at the recent SIGGRAPH 2009 conference was titled “Next Billion Cameras.”

More than a billion image sensors are manufactured each year with the majority going to digital cameras and mobile phone cameras. What are the implications of a billion cameras snapping photos around the world? Have the millions of online photos become a new data source that could be used in instructive or creative ways?

Alexei (Alyosha) Efros, assistant professor at the Robotics Institute and computer science department at Carnegie Mellon University, demonstrated how photos stored on Flickr and the other hosting services could be used to construct three-dimensional models of well-known tourist attractions, such as the Pantheon in Rome.

He also showed how an obstructed view, such as a landscape blocked by a building, could be repaired automatically using fill-in sections from a context-matched shot available online. The result becomes a seamless, idealized version of the original photo.

Posted in Digital Cameras | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Eyes to the Future

Foundation Trilogy

In the distant future, a mathematician discovers that civilization will undergo a 500-year collapse, followed by a 30,000-year period of great pain and suffering. He has calculated a path that could reduce the dark time to just 1,000 years. Unfortunately, the ruling regime has held his findings to be treasonous.

That’s the premise of the Foundation Trilogy by Isaac Asimov. It was given a one-time Hugo award in 1965 for “Best All-Time Series,” beating out Lord of the Rings (the first Dune book wasn’t published until that same year).

Based almost entirely on a series of short stories he published in “Astounding Magazine” from 1942 to 1950, Asimov was inspired by Edward Gibbon’s The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. In the Foundation stories, we view the events through the eyes of the mathematician’s followers, as they attempt to navigate through the treacherous historical currents.

Why hasn’t Hollywood turned the Foundation series into a big-budget movie? The short answer is, they’re working on it. In January, the rights were sold to Columbia Pictures. Roland Emmerich is set to direct, and Robert Rodat is busy working on the script. Rodat is best known for having written the script for Saving Private Ryan.

In the meantime, you can read the books. Or you can listen to an excellent eight-part BBC radio production that captures much of the intelligence, drama, and intrigue of Asimov’s original stories. The radio programs are available free through the Internet Archive. Here’s a link to download the radio series. If you just want to sample the radio programs, you can use this link to stream the first episode.

Posted in Audio | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Print to Metal

Ringpoem

It sounds incredible. You create a file on your computer, and then print that file as a metal object.

I visited the Shapeways booth earlier this month at the SIGGRAPH 2009 conference in New Orleans. Shapeways interfaces with 3D modeling programs to let you transform your 3D creations into plastic or stainless steel objects.

You can use the company’s website to upload your 3D design, as long as the design is in a standard 3D-modeling file format, such as STL, Collada, X3D, or VRML. You pay a fee based on the size of the resulting object, and Shapeways delivers the object globally within 22 business days for metal or 10 business days for plastic.

If you’re a product designer, you can participate in the Shapeways Shops program, which combines production, packaging, shipping, and customer care. That might be an expensive proposition for established mass-market designers who benefit from the lower costs associated with traditional manufacturing, but it could prove useful for less-commercial products or experimental designs.

Non-designers can also try out the technology. Using Shapeways Creator, you can design and purchase ringpoem napkin rings with a personal message, lightpoem lamps with a favorite quotation, or custom cufflinks with a particular style and initials.

This could be the start of a whole new cottage industry, where you would use specialized software to create and manufacture the physical products you want to decorate your home or office.

Posted in Other | Tagged , , | Leave a comment